[quills-dev] [Collective-checkins] r32160 - Quills/trunk
Tim Hicks tim at sitefusion.co.ukSun Oct 29 15:06:56 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [quills-dev] [Collective-checkins] r32160 - Quills/trunk
- Next message: [quills-dev] Re: [Collective-checkins] r32160 - Quills/trunk
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
quills-dev at lists.etria.com wrote: > Author: tomster > Date: Mon Oct 23 12:52:07 2006 > New Revision: 32160 > > Modified: > Quills/trunk/MetaWeblogAPI.py > Log: > minor fixes: case typo, whitespace, comment wording. > > Modified: Quills/trunk/MetaWeblogAPI.py > ============================================================================== > --- Quills/trunk/MetaWeblogAPI.py (original) > +++ Quills/trunk/MetaWeblogAPI.py Mon Oct 23 12:52:07 2006 > @@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ > value. > """ > ed = struct.get('pubDate', > - struct.get('pubdate', > - None) > - ) > + struct.get('pubdate', > + None) > + ) > if ed is None: > - ed = struct.get('dateCreated', > - struct.get('dateCreated', > - DateTime.DateTime()) > - ) > + ed = struct.get('datecreated', > + struct.get('dateCreated', > + DateTime.DateTime()) > + ) Actually, I find this whitespace structure to be considerably *less* readable than what we had before - where you could easily see the hierarchy of calls. Tim
- Previous message: [quills-dev] [Collective-checkins] r32160 - Quills/trunk
- Next message: [quills-dev] Re: [Collective-checkins] r32160 - Quills/trunk
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the quills-dev mailing list