[quills-dev] [Collective-checkins] r49551 - quills.remoteblogging/trunk/quills/remoteblogging/browser
Tom Lazar tom at tomster.orgWed Sep 19 09:08:23 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [quills-dev] [Collective-checkins] r49551 - quills.remoteblogging/trunk/quills/remoteblogging/browser
- Next message: [quills-dev] [Collective-checkins] r49551 - quills.remoteblogging/trunk/quills/remoteblogging/browser
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 19, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Tim Hicks wrote: >> Modified: quills.remoteblogging/trunk/quills/remoteblogging/ >> browser/metaweblogapi.py >> ===================================================================== >> ========= >> --- quills.remoteblogging/trunk/quills/remoteblogging/browser/ >> metaweblogapi.py (original) >> +++ quills.remoteblogging/trunk/quills/remoteblogging/browser/ >> metaweblogapi.py Tue Sep 18 21:43:16 2007 >> @@ -115,14 +115,12 @@ >> def getUsersBlogs(self, appkey, username, password): >> """See IMetaWeblogAPI. >> """ >> - app = IUIDManager(self.context).getByUID(appkey) >> - return IUserManager(app).getWeblogsForUser(username) >> + return IUserManager(self.context).getWeblogsForUser >> (username) >> >> def getUserInfo(self, appkey, username, password): >> """See IMetaWeblogAPI. >> """ >> - app = IUIDManager(self.context).getByUID(appkey) >> - return IUserManager(app).getUserInfo(username) >> + return IUserManager(self.context).getUserInfo(username) > Yes, as you suspected in your tracker message, this part of your > change > caught my eye. Can you give the rationale for the change? sure. the reason was that the getUsersBlogs and getUserInfo both attempted to first fetch an object with a UID of appkey. this uid however never existed in any of the cases that i tested. as per specification of metaweblog API this mechanism is intended to discover *all* blogs (of a given user) at a given url. actually, i'm not sure, what the previous implementation did. i also don't know how the client acquires the 'appkey' that it provides. specifically, this behaviour meant that the 'ecto' client no longer worked because it first calls getUsersBlogs and then getUserInfo and they both raised an exception (because there was no object with a UID of what ecto supplied -- it was a longish hexstring, but not in UID format). my approach was to say that we don't support returning multiple blog instances (i'm not sure it makes sense, anyway: if i provide a url to a specifc blog instance why would i want the instance of another blog offered, as well? if a want the other blog, i just provide its url directly) so the loss of functionality isn't really that great. additionally, that functionality wasn't even tested or known to work. long story short: with the changes above ecto (and probably some other clients, too) work again. before that they didn't. whew ;-) > > Tim >
- Previous message: [quills-dev] [Collective-checkins] r49551 - quills.remoteblogging/trunk/quills/remoteblogging/browser
- Next message: [quills-dev] [Collective-checkins] r49551 - quills.remoteblogging/trunk/quills/remoteblogging/browser
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the quills-dev mailing list