[quills-dev] vice ready for action?
Tom Lazar tom at tomster.orgThu Sep 20 10:44:34 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [quills-dev] vice ready for action?
- Next message: [quills-dev] [Quills Issue Tracker] New issue: #107 - removeCreatorFromAuthors.py should be a view method
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
hi derek, thanks for clearing that up. i'll stick to fatsyndication then for 1.6 (and a souped up version of the default rss_template.pt for my other projects) but am looking forward to working with vice after that. btw are you attending the conference in naples? kai diefenbach and i will be sprinting on commenting and that would fit nicely with syndication (i.e. feeds for comments etc.) cheers, tom On 20.09.2007, at 04:11, Derek Richardson wrote: > On 9/19/07, Tom Lazar <tom at tomster.org> wrote: > hi derek, tim, et. al, > > i spent some time today looking at vice and i'm intrigued and agree > with tim (and probably derek, too ;-) that vice is the way to move > forward. > > however, i wasn't able to get it to work with the quills bundle and > also not on the vice bundle itself, either. > > i tried creating a feed for the default news folder. i enabled > syndication itself at `/syndication-controlpanel` and added an atom > feed (name = 'foo') and an rss2.0 feed (name = 'bar') at `/news/ > configurefeeds`. > > by doing so i get an error message, but that seems to be just a > cosmetic glitch, as there is no error output in the log and the error > message reads "Error Updated on 2007-09-19 22:29: 20.299021" > > Yep, I've seen that. Annoying but cosmetic. If you notice the > cause, please let me know. ;) > > after doing so, there are no feed links visible > > Yep, that's why making the feed links visible is the last piece of > *real* functionality to be completed before the alpha release. > > and attempting to > load `/news/foo` or `/news/bar` results in a 404. > > That's not it. :) > > just for kicks i tried `/news/atom` which gave me this: > > Traceback (innermost last): > Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 119, in publish > Module ZPublisher.mapply, line 88, in mapply > Module ZPublisher.Publish , line 42, in call_object > Module plone.syndication.outbound.browser.feed, line 28, in > __call__ > AttributeError: feed_name > > Yep, that's not it either. :) > > > as i said, i'm intrigued by the possibility of using vice for quills > (and also for two other plone 3.0 based projects that i'm working on) > but i'm not sure it's ready yet. > > This is why this putting the links in the ui is so important. Try: > > /news/@@atom/foo > > and > > /news/@@atom/bar > > The '@@' is unfortunately necessary right now to stop traversal at > the view in z2, unlike in z3. That's on the list of things to fix > before the Final release. > > at the moment it doesn't look like it's going to make it into quills > 1.6 because i only got two more days left and there are still 14 > other bugs left :-( > > Sure, Vice is pre-alpha, so it's probably premature for 1.6. But > I'm very happy you're working with it! > > > however, the most serious of those are concerned with trackbacks not > working. how's that state on inbound syndication with vice? if using > vice would solve the trackback problems that quills has atm it might > be worth getting vice into quills, after all... > > Inbound is not in any shape that would be useful to you. :( > > any opinion or help would be greatly appreciated. > > tom > -- > Tom Lazar > http://tomster.org > > Tom Lazar http://tomster.org
- Previous message: [quills-dev] vice ready for action?
- Next message: [quills-dev] [Quills Issue Tracker] New issue: #107 - removeCreatorFromAuthors.py should be a view method
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the quills-dev mailing list