Skip to content.

Etria Lists

 

[quills-dev] [Quills Issue Tracker] New issue: #127 - does not play nicely with Intranet/Extranet Workflow

Derek Richardson plone at derekrichardson.net
Mon Jan 7 19:59:51 UTC 2008


On Jan 7, 2008 1:56 PM, Sasha Vincic
<sasha.vincic at valentinewebsystems.com> wrote:
> On 7 jan 2008, at 19.35, Derek Richardson wrote:
> >
> > Why code Quills to workflow states? Why not just have Quills obey the
> > visibility attributes on the underlying content items according to
> > standard permissions? Thus viewing a blog post, like viewing content
> > in other ways, could be managed by workflows written by admins.
> >
> > This opens up having blogs that display user-specific entries based on
> > security. That sounds nice, to me.
>
> This won't work since what you imply is the same as to remove the
> review_state from the query. This would return all entries that the
> current user is allowed to view but you probably do not want to have
> public drafts there?

If it's public, then why isn't it in? Shouldn't it be private if it is
to be hidden?

> > BTW, this problem is why blogs are borken on my site, but, since all
> > my workflows are custom, none of the variations on 'hardcode a
> > workflow name' will work for me.
>
>
> As Kim mentioned a way to configure which states to use would probably
> a better way. I have vague memory that I have seen that kind of
> configuration somewhere in Plone or a add-on product but I can't
> remember where. The configuration was something about use-these-states-
> as-publish-states.

How about inverting it and have 'hide these states'? That would work
better for me. Others' use cases?

Derek


More information about the quills-dev mailing list